EVIDENCE:
Retrofit laws are feasible, effective, and common life-safety policy.

Across the country, cities and states have successfully adopted retroactive sprinkler requirements for existing high-rise buildings and other multi-unit occupancies. These laws demonstrate that retrofits can be completed without displacement, with affordable long-term compliance timelines, and with major public-safety benefits for residents and firefighters.

Below is a representative list of jurisdictions that have required sprinklers in older buildings after construction, proving the feasibility of San Francisco’s own high-rise retrofit law.

Cities with high-rise sprinkler retrofit laws

States with broad retrofit laws covering multiple building types

What does this all mean for San Francisco?

Retrofits are mainstream safety policy.

Major U.S. cities and states have already implemented high-rise retrofit laws successfully.

Costs are manageable with long timelines.

Cities routinely allow five to 15 years for compliance, reducing disruption and preventing displacement.

Lives are saved.

Sprinklers reduce high-rise fire deaths by 80% to 90%, protect firefighters, and limit catastrophic property loss.

SF is not alone — and not extreme. 

SF’s 12-year retrofit timeline is entirely in line with national norms and is more flexible than several peer jurisdictions.

Primary Sources

Read the position statement adopted by the International Association of Fire Chiefs on fire sprinkler retrofits.

Read the fact sheet from the Sprinkler Fitters Association of California and the National Fire Sprinkler Association.

Read the San Francisco Building & Construction Trades Council’s letter to the SF Board of Supervisors.